• unlimited access with print and download
    $ 37 00
  • read full document, no print or download, expires after 72 hours
    $ 4 99
More info
Unlimited access including download and printing, plus availability for reading and annotating in your in your Udini library.
  • Access to this article in your Udini library for 72 hours from purchase.
  • The article will not be available for download or print.
  • Upgrade to the full version of this document at a reduced price.
  • Your trial access payment is credited when purchasing the full version.
Buy
Continue searching

Strategies for Identifying Learning Disability in Limited English Proficient Students: A Case of Nigeria's E[dotbelow]doland

ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 2011
Dissertation
Author: Osemwonyenmwen A Arhebamen
Abstract:
The early cessation of the mother tongue (MT) and early introduction of English in Nigeria's classrooms may cause children to perform poorly if they lack mastery of skills in either language. The use of English as a medium of instruction in an elementary school where students speak a different primary language, but are taught in English before they have had the opportunity to master linguistic skills in their MT, may cause difficulties in learning. Few researchers have examined this possibility. The purpose of this study was to explore the factors that contribute to the problem of low academic achievement of students with limited English proficiency (LEP). The theories of cognitive and pragmatic language acquisition, cognitive development and social interconnectedness, and disability inquiry grounded this study. The primary research question involved identifying significant factors that lead to LD. Using an exploratory case study research design, data were gathered from an elementary school in a rural area of E[dotbelow]do State, Nigeria. Qualitative data collection and analysis included structured interviews and observations on focused groups in the field, which were coded to reveal significant themes. Findings revealed that LEP, the lack of adequate resources, and poor learning facilities hamper students' academic progress. This study is intended to serve as a pilot for other researchers in the field to identify culturally relevant strategies and intervention measures to assist the learning of limited English proficient students with learning disabilities. Implications for social change include providing culturally relevant and inclusive education information to policy makers and educators for the creation of a cohesive special education delivery system and effective organization of education in Nigeria and other developing countries.

i Table of Contents List of Tables ..................................................................................................................... vi List of Figures ................................................................................................................... vii Chapter 1: Introduction to the Study ....................................................................................1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 The Problem of Statement .................................................................................................11 Nature of the Study ............................................................................................................11 Research Questions ............................................................................................................13 Purpose of Study ................................................................................................................14 Conceptual Framework ......................................................................................................15 Definition of Terms............................................................................................................18 Scope of Study ...................................................................................................................20 Significance of the Study ...................................................................................................21 Summary ............................................................................................................................23

Chapter 2: Literature Review .............................................................................................25 Introduction ........................................................................................................................25 Defining Learning Disability .............................................................................................33 Diagnosing Learning Disability in LEP students...............................................................37 A Quagmire of Languages .....................................................................................46 Mother Tongue Ungroundedness ...........................................................................50 Pidgin English ........................................................................................................53 Proficiency in the Language of instruction ........................................................ ...55

ii Limited English Vocabulary ..................................................................................58 Learning Styles ..................................................................................................................59 Strategies for Intervention..................................................................................................65 Building Students' Self-esteem ....................................................................................67 Additive Language Approach to Intervention .............................................................73 Collaboration between Special Education and General Education Teachers ..............80 Progress Monitoring and True Inclusion ...........................................................................84 Summary ............................................................................................................................86

Chapter 3: Research Method ..............................................................................................89

Introduction ........................................................................................................................89 Research Design.................................................................................................................91 Data Collection ..................................................................................................................93 Participants ...................................................................................................................94 Observation ................................................................................................................. 94 Interview Protocol .......................................................................................................95 Data Analysis .................................................................................................................97 Reliability and Validity of Qualitative Instruments ...........................................................99 Researcher's Role .............................................................................................................101 Ethical Issues ...................................................................................................................102 Summary ..........................................................................................................................104

Chapter 4: Results ............................................................................................................105

Introduction ......................................................................................................................105

iii

Research Instruments .......................................................................................................107 Observation ................................................................................................................108 Interview Protocol ................................................................................................110 Data Findings for Research Question 1 ...........................................................................112 Role of Rural Classroom Teacher ........................................................................119 Language Disability .............................................................................................123 Reading Disability ...............................................................................................125 Data Findings for Research Question 2 ....................................................................... ...128 Inclusive Education Model ..................................................................................135 Collaboration for Inclusion ..................................................................................137 Data Findings for Research Question 3 ...........................................................................140 Codeswitching as a Bridge to Proficiency in English ................................................148 Response Facilitation in the Classroom .....................................................................151 The Problem of Language Acquisition ......................................................................153 Summary of Findings .......................................................................................................156

Chapter 5: Discussion, Conclusions, and Recommendations ..........................................160

Introduction ......................................................................................................................160 Interpretation of Findings ................................................................................................162 Discussion of Findings for Research Question 1 .............................................................163 Differential Learning Styles .................................................................................163 Conducive Learning Environment, Availability of Learning Tools and Teacher Preparation ...................................................................................................166

iv Recognition of Learning Disability in the Rural Areas .......................................169 Discussion Findings for Research Question 2 .................................................................171 Implementing an Inclusive Inclusion Model .......................................................171 The Role of Collaboration ..................................................................................... ...172 Discussion of Findings for Research Question 3 .............................................................175 Codeswitching as a Bridge to Knowledge Organization .....................................175 Enforcing the Language Policy ..................................................................................178 Implications for Social Change ........................................................................................181 Systemic Change ........................................................................................................183 Redressing Learning Disability ..................................................................................185 Enforcing a State Language Policy ......................................................................186 Recommendations for Action ..........................................................................................188 Piloting a Reading First Program in Kindergarten through Third Grade ............ 189 Use of Screening and Diagnostic Tools ...............................................................189 Licensure, Re-Licensure, and Tenure for Teachers .............................................191 Parental Involvement ...........................................................................................192 Reading Buddies ..................................................................................................193 Recommendation for Further Study.................................................................................193 Personal Reflections.........................................................................................................194 Conclusion .......................................................................................................................198

References ........................................................................................................................202 Appendix A: Permission to Interview and Observe Teachers .........................................224

v Appendix B: Teacher Consent Form ...............................................................................226 Appendix C: Observation Checklist ................................................................................229 Appendix D: Interview Protocol ......................................................................................230

Appendix E: A Poem .......................................................................................................233

Curriculum Vitae .............................................................................................................235

vi List of Tables Table 1. Categories of Nigerian Special Education Services in 1986 ...............................30 Table 2. Common Characteristics in ESL/LD Students’ Language Developments ..........40 Table 3. Self-Reported and Tested Literacy in Nigeria, Population 15-49 years ..............50 Table 4.

do Vowels with Corresponding English Vowels ..............................................52 Table 5. English and Pidgin English Compared ................................................................55 Table 6. Learning Styles of Minority and Majority Cultures ............................................60 Table 7. Building Vocabulary through Independent Reading ...........................................71 Table 8. Adult Literacy in Nigeria .....................................................................................86 Table 9. Observation Checklist: Teachers’ Codeswitches ...............................................108 Table 10. Data Collection Component.............................................................................111 Table 11. Teachers’ Elicited Responses to Interview Questions 1-9...............................112 Table 12. Perspectives of African American Teachers on Identification of and

Intervention for Learning Disability .................................................................121 Table 13. Result of English Language Test .....................................................................125 Table 14. Teachers’ Elicited Responses to Interview Questions 10-16...........................129 Table 15. Teachers’ Elicited Responses to Interview Questions 17-22...........................141 Table 16. People and Demography of

do State .............................................................156 Table 17. Special Education Enrolment at the Primary School Level .............................170 Table 18. Enforcing Multilingual Policy in

do State .....................................................179

vii List of Figures Figure 1. Map of Nigeria with

do State .........................................................................155 Figure 2. Possible causes of learning disability.....……………………………………..157 Figure 3. A lack of classroom furniture...……………………………………………... 199

1 Chapter 1: Introduction to the Study Introduction Many scholars have found that limited English proficiency is a major cause of the decline in academic achievement and standard of education in Nigeria. To corrobor ate the findings, 400 senior secondary school (SSS II; Grade 11) students were, in a rece nt research study, proportionately sampled from eight randomly selected sec ondary schools in two states, and were given the English Language Proficiency Test (EL PT). The results showed that the language proficiency level of the students in English is a predictor of students’ overall academic achievement (Fakeye & Ogunsiji, 2009). However, ther e is a dearth of research on the identification of students who may be experiencing le arning difficulty as a result of limited English proficiency (LEP) in addition t o an undiagnosed learning disability. Students living in rural Nigeria’s

doland may experience low academic achievement because a language difference, the difference between the home la nguage and the language of instruction, impedes their success. The language of instruction i s English, and many students in the rural areas are unable to master it. This proble m is masking a learning disability and has, for a number of years, prevented the students from making significant or modest progress in learning at school. With no intervention in place, and limited availability of resources for the delivery of such servic es, the reasons for the academic challenges experienced by rural students may be li mited to English proficiency, or low literacy levels in the native language. The rural stude nt, who may also not be well grounded in the mother tongue, may only have receptive skills but lack

2 expressive proficiency and writing skills in the primary language as we ll as in English, which is the language of instruction. It is, therefore, not unusual to hear an outbur st like the one recorded here:

“Nah lah! It is not mah borflend. It is my blordah!” The utterance of Agnes, an actual student from one of the schools in rural Nigeria’s

doland, rendered in broken English and in an accent that is peculiar to her own ethnic group, is an attempt to communicate in the language of instruction. Would this speech make sense to a teacher who is from a different ethnic group as the st udent, and especially to an English-only teacher? Translating Agnes’s speec h into standard English, the language of instruction, it becomes clear what she was attempti ng to communicate to her accusers: “It’s a lie! He is not my boyfriend. He is my brother!” It would be difficult to tell if this student, a prototype of pupils receiving education in rural Nigeria, has a learning disability, or if this utterance m erely showcases the difficulty of communicating in the language of instruction. It is probable that Agnes does not have a learning disability, but is being actively exposed to English for t he first time.

3 The U. S. Department of Education describes students who did not grow up in a primarily English-speaking setting and lack the skills necessary to le arn in an English- only environment as English language learners (ELLs; LeClair et al., 2009). E LLs in the U. S. are not succeeding academically due to insufficient English-lan guage reading, writing, speaking, or listening skills, despite receiving additional support servi ces (McCardle et al., 2005). Nigerian students, especially those from rural area s, come from settings where English is not the first language. The students face the dual challenge of learning a new language and, at the same time, they are expected to perfor m well in content areas (Bowman-Perrott & Murry, 2010). This is because the National Polic y on Education (NPE), published in 1977 and revised in 1981, makes provision for

English to be taught as a subject in Grades 1 to 3 with the language of the immediate ethnic gr oup used as the medium of instruction. From the fourth grade, there is a reversal of roles : English progressively becomes the medium of instruction while the language o f the immediate ethnic group is taught as a subject (UNESCO IBE, 2006). Nigeria’s policy on education envisages a transitional bilingual education which

allows children to temporarily use the home language as they are expected to be proficient enough by the end of Primary 3, at the age of 8, to transfer linguistic skills from Language 1(L1) to Language 2 (L2).

The observation of a recent study on the implementation of the language policy in Ghana, which also runs a transitional bilingua l program like Nigeria, and most developing countries (Igboanusi, 2008), reveals that the early exit of the mother tongue and the early introduction of English tend

to

make children perform poorly because they did not master skills either in the mother tongu e or

4 English (Salami, 2008).

The critical period for effective transition to literacy is the first 9 to 12 years, according to Cummins (as cited in Salami, 2008). Children make rapid cognitive and academic progress in literacy acquisition in both L1 and L2 between ages 9 and 12 rather than between the ages of 5 and 8, as Nigeria’s language policy mand ated. Although some researchers have examined the language provisions of the NPE (Awoboluyi, 1992), studies assessing the problems and prospects of implementing mother tongue-based bilingual education in schools in Nigeria are scarce (Ig boanusi, 2008).

This may pose a stumbling block to the rural students, and anyone who is culturally and linguistically different, since ungrounding in the mother tongue a nd limited English proficiency may result in low academic achievement which may in t urn

overshadow or mask the presence of a learning disability (Fawcett & Lynch , 2000). Candelaria-Greene (1996) cited an example of students who attend a special educat ion school for developmental disabilities in Kenya and yet are able to demonstr ate fluency in three or more languages. The answer to Candelaria-Greene’s (1996) question about what promotes multilingualism among Kenyan students with mental retardation i s to be found in the language policies, expectations, and practices in Kenya. The Kenyan language policy used in the educational system is based on assumptions that support proficien cy in which literacy skills from Language 1(L1) to Language 2 (L2) is faci litated. The special needs students receive additive orientation to their primary language and culture

(Candelaria-Greene, 1996) Taking the necessary steps to develop educational program s in which the native language and English are equally important and students are gui ded to

5 attain receptive and expressive skills will make it easier to identify l earning disabilities and plan appropriate interventions. A detailed discussion of the literature of the eff ect of language ungroundedness on academic achievement will be found in chapter 2.

The establishment of Section 8 of the National Policy on Education by the Federal Ministry of Education appeared to be a progressive step for Nigeria. Nigeri a’s Section 8 spells out the policy on special education. It was introduced in 1977 for the purpose of providing equal educational opportunities for both gifted and handicapped individuals (Obiakor, 1990).

It is comparable to America’s PL 94-142, also known as Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The history of special education in t he United States has been a series of legislations passed to ensure equal rights for t hose children who did not conform to the standard of learning in the regular or mainstream classroom . It was not until the 1970s that PL 94-142 was passed (Bowen & Rude, 2006). No Child Left Behind (NCLB; 2002) and IDEA are two federal mandates that evidence t he educational reforms in the United States. The passage of the Education for all Handicapped Children Act (PL 94-142) in 1975 opened the door for students with disabilities to attend the same neighborhood schools as their peers (Bowen & Rude, 2006). The status of special education in Nigeria, when compared with that in the Unit ed States, shows that much still needs to be done. Oluigbo (1990) drew the attention of the Nigerian federal government to the students with cognitive impairments, border line, or at-risk students who did not fit the traditional mode. These students, according to some researchers (Bakare, 1992; Obiakor, Bragg, & Maltby, 1993) are integrated int o the

6 mainstream. Ogbue (as cited in Obiakor, 1991)

observed that there were no systemic screening and assessment facilities available for exceptional childr en in Nigeria. Admission and integration of special education do not follow the sequence of (a) screening, (b) referral, (c) evaluation, (d) identification, and (e) individuali zed program development. Ogunlade (1989) said there has been no effective effort to identify instruments to assess the strengths and weaknesses of students as a result of the lack of federal laws mandating special education services. Even though Section 7 of the revised National Policy on education emphasizes the inclusion of children with special educational needs, equalizing education for all irrespective of the area of need is still a struggle, mostly stemming f rom corruption (Ajuwon, 2008). The once viable educational system, which witnessed tremendous expansion following Nigeria’s independence from Britain in 1960, began to experience decline in 1986 when economic depression resulting from mismanagement of the national economy necessitated the introduction of the Structural Adjustment Program

(SAP). The economic decline, which was brought about by SAP, also limited access to education for poor Nigerians, especially those living in rural areas. The frequent changes in government due to military coups, a depressed economy, and unplanned and uncontrolled educational expansion all created an environment of crisis in the educati onal system. The crisis brought about other challenges: poor funding, inadequate faciliti es, admission and certificate racketeering, examination malpractices, frequent teacher strikes and school closures. All these had serious effects on the development and implementati on of sound special education policy (Garuba, 2003). Although the use of English language

7 in schools in Nigeria may help students improve their use of the English language, schools in rural areas in Nigeria do not have access to Standard English language

teaching tools. According to Ibekwe (2008), some teachers have difficult y communicating in English. Teachers who speak Standard English must be hired to t each in rural areas so as to help these students improve upon their use of the English language . In rural communities, the concurrent use of the

do language for primary school years and English as a second language is a strategy that has helped rural s tudents improve their language and cognitive skills. Afolayan (1976) pointed out the cognitive reward obtained when the mother tongue was used by citing the Six Year Primar y Ile Ife project, which was launched by the University of Ife, Ile Ife, Nigeria in 1970. T hree areas were investigated by the Ile Ife project: the medium of instruction, curri culum, and the variable concerning the teaching of English. Participants in the project wer e put in control and experimental groups. The experimental group used Yoruba as the medium of instruction for all 6 years in the primary grade while the control group used Y oruba for the first three years and then transitioned into English. While the experimental group was supplied with new and enriched material, the control group used the traditional materi al available to the public school children. The conclusive result, said Obondo, Cummins, and Corson (1997) showed that students who were exposed to the mother tongue as a medium of instruction for all primary grades had more cognitive and linguisti c gains than those that were exposed to the mother tongue for only three years. Similar expe rience of gains is recorded among Nigerian adults taught in Hausa and English (Fajo nyomi & Ala- Adeyemi, 1993).

8 Hispanic children in the U.S. with proficiency in the mother tongue and a second language performed cognitive tasks better than did monolinguals from the sam e culture (Ramirez & Shapiro, 2007). Competence in the second language has also been linked to competence in the mother tongue at the time of exposure to the second language. Hamers

and Blanc (1995) call this “developmental interdependence” (p. 54). Cummins (1979) described this as instruction that develops reading and writing rather than simpl y developing linguistic skills in that language, thus developing a deeper conceptual linguistic proficiency that can transfer to the second language. Cummins (1984) r eported that low achieving preschool children outperformed their counterparts after they were exposed to language-enriching experiences in their mother tongue. This, however, presupposes the use of the mother tongue as the medium of instruction for the first 6 years of school and English as a concurrent second language. In rural areas of developing countries, children may be instructed in their mothe r tongue, whereas the curriculum and materials are in a different language. In structing children in one language and expecting them to perform in another language is a challenge for learners (Manis, Lindsey, & Bailey, 2004), which may have a negative effect on self-esteem as well as motivation to learn (Grolnick & Ryan, 2001). The long- term effect is that students may lose both languages, especially those stude nts who are already academically challenged. Students who have serious learning and behavior disorders and needs that may qualify them for special education services are often retained in the same grade without any intervention programs put in place to assist their learning (UNESCO IB E, 2006). In

9 these situations, there are no resource rooms to which students could go for additiona l help; nor are there diagnostic tests done to ascertain or determine if a lear ning disability or a language difference is the reason for the poor academic performance. The pe rcentage of repeaters in the primary school is 3% (UNESCO Institute for Statisti cs, 2006). Neither the parents nor the teachers have the needed training or know that they can argue for the availability of resources needed for the delivery of such services because o f their limited knowledge about the requirements for special education (Obiakor, 1990). This lapse is further buttressed by the few Nigerian universities that have special educa tion departments: 1.

University of Ibadan started the Diploma in special education in 1974 and a bachelor’s program in 1976 2.

University of Jos started a bachelor’s program in special education in 1977 and a master’s in 1978 3.

The Federal Government College of Education, Special, established in 1977 (Garuba, 2003) Even though Nigerian leaders support the Salamanca Conference of 1994, which argues for the education of all children, irrespective of their physical and mental conditions, the Nigerian Government has been slow in developing and promoting special education facilities in the country. According to Obiakor (1991), cultural, socioeconom ic, and political factors have hampered the successful implementation of special e ducation policies in Nigeria. The level of awareness of parents of their rights of advoc acy, litigation, and legislation is low. This lack of awareness, as noted by Obiakor (1991) , is a

10 factor that limits their abilities to seek the necessary help on behalf of t heir children. Poverty continues to be an obstacle to the delivery of special education services and inclusive education in Nigeria, which is further complicated by the more fundam ental tasks of developing a cohesive special education delivery system as cited by the World Data on Education, 2006. Enrollment of school age children with special needs is 42%, compared to 67% of children without special needs (Garuba, 2003). Special education policies in Nigeria are not formulated in isolation because of the role of the federal government in providing education and educational opportunities

for the people of Nigeria (Obiakor, 1990). Section 8 of the National Policy of Education could be an equivalent of the United States’ IDEA, except that it is a national poli cy on special education, not a law. Under IDEA, public schools are required to provide free and appropriate education (FAPE) to eligible children with special needs in the lea st restrictive environment. A team of knowledgeable persons which must include a parent and the general education teacher are required by law to develop an appropriate

individualized education plan (IEP) for each child. The special education related s ervice outline in the IEP must reflect the needs of the students. Learning in a second language without first being grounded in the primary language results in the underdevelopment of the mother tongue of the students. Evidence points to the importance of teaching pupils conceptual subjects like mathematics and science in their first language (Mooko, 2004). Other evidence has found that, around the world, when a former colonial language has been adopted to educate the majority who do

11 not speak that language, students experience higher dropout rates and higher levels of failure to achieve academic success (UNESCO, 2000; Dixon, 2005). The Problem Statement Low academic achievement in reading and other related school subjects is a problem among students in rural Nigeria (UNESCO IBE, 2006). Teachers in Nig eria’s elementary classrooms engage in a bilingual practice that is unstructure d in curricular application (Salami, 2004), failing to comply with the National Policy on Education (NPE), which mandated the use of the mother tongue as the medium of instruction in Grades 1-3 and English in Grades 4 and up (Ibekwe, 2008). Though low literacy may be the cause of learning difficulties among students , low literacy may mask a learning disability (Fawcett & Lynch, 2000; Wagner et al., 2005). This study is concerned with identifying learning disabilities among l imited English proficient students, 10 years of age in rural

doland and the interventions to assist their learning. Nature of the Study The nature of this study is a qualitative case study research design that i ntegrates observation and in-depth interview and ethnography in a bid to understand the dynamics involved in the factors relating to the academic failure of rural students. In thi s single instrumental case study, I focused on an issue or concern (Creswell, 2007). This tr adition allowed me to delve into the factors that are responsible for low academic achievement among rural students. The study qualitatively focused on repercussive outcome s of language ungrounding among English language learners, and aspects of Edo culture that

12 showcase the way children learn and are trained. Traditional education has been re legated to the background in favor of a European model of education. This relegation of traditional education has changed the meaning of intelligence. This change a lso influences assumptions about learning disabilities and special education placeme nt. The inability to communicate or perform tasks in the language of instruction, whic h in most cases is English, is taken as cognitive deficiency. A misdiagnosis could c ause a child to be erroneously placed in special education, since the characteristics of s tudents learning to speak a second language parallel those of students with learning disabiliti es (Klingner & Artiles, 2006). Other paradigms were considered as possible designs for this research study

before finally arriving at an instrumental case study.

Ethnography was the first option considered because the focus of the study is the rural elementary school pupils of Nigeria’s

doland. This tradition would require the researcher to study a cultural group in a natural setting over a prolonged period of time collecting observational data ( Hatch, 2002), with the researcher spending time in the field. Data collection is not a singl e act. A researcher collects data, analyzes it, and returns to the field to collect s ome more data to analyze. This tradition did not seem feasible because of the abductive process of collecting and analyzing data. A qualitative paradigm utilizing the phenomenological tradition was another

option considered for this study. However, the phenomenological tradition did not address the research questions of this instrumental case study effectivel y . Hatch (2002) stated that phenomenological tradition is concerned with “the lived experiences of several

13 individuals about a concept or a phenomenon” (Hatch, 2002, p. 51). The rationale for this specific paradigm and tradition is based on the assumption that a natural setting f or the study would enable the researcher to enter into the ‘inner world’ of partici pants for understanding of how the ‘ungrounding’ in either the primary language or English, “constructed from their lived experiences” (Johnson & Christensen, 2004, p. 364) impacted their rural education. This option was abandoned because the findings may not provide clues for what needs to be done to reverse the situation of low academic achievement. Research Questions

Questions, according to Hatch (2002), give direction to the study and limit the scope of investigation. Questions will be qualitative in nature, open-ended, and few in number (Hatch, 2002). Given these guidelines, three main research questions with subquestions added for depth were formulated for this study: RQ1: What are the strategies put in place for identifying learning disabil ities in

Full document contains 254 pages
Abstract: The early cessation of the mother tongue (MT) and early introduction of English in Nigeria's classrooms may cause children to perform poorly if they lack mastery of skills in either language. The use of English as a medium of instruction in an elementary school where students speak a different primary language, but are taught in English before they have had the opportunity to master linguistic skills in their MT, may cause difficulties in learning. Few researchers have examined this possibility. The purpose of this study was to explore the factors that contribute to the problem of low academic achievement of students with limited English proficiency (LEP). The theories of cognitive and pragmatic language acquisition, cognitive development and social interconnectedness, and disability inquiry grounded this study. The primary research question involved identifying significant factors that lead to LD. Using an exploratory case study research design, data were gathered from an elementary school in a rural area of E[dotbelow]do State, Nigeria. Qualitative data collection and analysis included structured interviews and observations on focused groups in the field, which were coded to reveal significant themes. Findings revealed that LEP, the lack of adequate resources, and poor learning facilities hamper students' academic progress. This study is intended to serve as a pilot for other researchers in the field to identify culturally relevant strategies and intervention measures to assist the learning of limited English proficient students with learning disabilities. Implications for social change include providing culturally relevant and inclusive education information to policy makers and educators for the creation of a cohesive special education delivery system and effective organization of education in Nigeria and other developing countries.